[EricH]

Originally Posted by lgphoneeric

I would think so, it technically follows the definition of a catch I believe.

It did not contact the human player. It did not contact the carpet. It did not contact the robot shooting over the truss. It was possessed (carry OR trap, your choice) by a robot of the proper alliance.

That better have been counted as a catch... assuming the refs weren't too busy picking their jaws up off the floor from the shock.