[NotInControl]

Originally Posted by cgmv123

Note that disabled, by definition, disables all outputs, regardless of what code you write. This is a safety feature (or "feature", depending on who you talk to.) It doesn't look like you're trying to activate any inputs, but it's something to be aware of when customizing disable code.

Only PWM and Relay outputs are disabled. Digital In, Digital Out, and Analog In are all fully functional during the disabled state of the robot. You can set digital output pins high or low in disabled. Digital IO should never be used to drive actuators as per FRC rules, which is why its state are allowed to be commanded during disable.

Originally Posted by gappleto97

In that case, where do I put it? Because I tried this, and I distinctly remember it not working. I'm thinking I must have put it in the wrong place or something, maybe.

Unless you are creating a new class which extends IterativeRobot, the super.DisableInit() does not exist. That implies that disabledInit() exist in the parent class you are inheriting from.

The first definition of DisabledInit() is in the IterativeRobot class, so is you are trying to call super.DisabledInit() inside of IterativeRobot, or CommandBasedRobot, that is probably why its failing.

Also do not include any @override annotations, as mentioned already they are not supported by the JVM on the cRIO.

Hope this helps,
Kevin