View Single Post
  #95   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-05-2014, 18:53
stuart2054 stuart2054 is offline
Controls Mentor
AKA: Stuart Sebright
FRC #2054 (TECH Vikes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hopkins Michigan
Posts: 102
stuart2054 is just really nicestuart2054 is just really nicestuart2054 is just really nicestuart2054 is just really nicestuart2054 is just really nice
Re: IRI Rule Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman View Post
Yeah and no triple balancing in qualifying either, u lucky widebots! Oh, wait, nevermind...sorry - flashbacks

I felt there were many "phantom" assists credited in the Newton division. Balls bouncing off of robots (often rookies) with no hint of actual possession. Sometimes I swear they never even touched the thing. I'd like to avoid that.

I'd like possession to be achieved by either.....

1. Active capture/release with a mechanism, even for a brief instant.
2. Trapping the ball against a field element or another robot.
3. Obvious herding of the ball in a direction (you travel in the same direction as the ball).

Basketball players are permitted touch passes, are they not? Soccer and hockey players can advance the ball/puck without holding it in their possession for an extended period, right? Why not robots? But all of them make some kind of intentional interaction with the game piece to direct it down an intended path. It's not like their teammates regularly bounce the thing off their skates or backs or domes as part of regular gameplay. The robot must be an active and knowing part of the transfer process.
I agree with this. There should be some actual interaction of the robot with the ball.
__________________
2054 Tech Vikes
Reply With Quote