Thread: Bumper Material
View Single Post
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-05-2014, 17:53
nuclearnerd's Avatar
nuclearnerd nuclearnerd is offline
Speaking for myself, not my team
AKA: Brendan Simons
FRC #5406 (Celt-X)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 446
nuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant futurenuclearnerd has a brilliant future
Re: Bumper Material

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate Laverdure View Post
Sounds like a great new revenue stream for the AndyMark Fabrics Division.
Exactly. Placing the division at "comes that way from the factory" is silly (although I recognize that may be the way it is). In that case I would happily have my local fabric store apply the coating, then offer it back to me as a "commercial part". It would be counterproductive to FIRST goals to have rules that discourage in-house fabrication but allow purchasing the same item from 3rd parties.

Please note that this question is purely academic for this year - We didn't modify our fabric at all. I'm thinking about next year.

Last edited by nuclearnerd : 03-05-2014 at 17:58.
Reply With Quote