View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-05-2014, 10:38
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Einstein Drivetrains?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnewendyke View Post
2 butterfly-esk drive trains (1477, 1625), so there were about the same number of 'cutting edge'/'out there' drives (for lack of better terms) as west coasts
I wouldn't really consider 1625's 4 wheel tank drive with omnis on the front a 'butterfly-esk' drive. It is far more similar to a tank drive, in my opinion.

I think the biggest take away from that list is 8 6 CIM tank drives compared to 4 4 CIM tank drives. 2 to 1 ratio is pretty significant and very new.
Reply With Quote