View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-05-2014, 12:17
Rauhul Varma Rauhul Varma is offline
Drivetrain and Design Lead
FRC #0192 (GRT)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 49
Rauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud ofRauhul Varma has much to be proud of
Re: Ball Shifter Force Requirements

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigboez View Post
Thats interesting, thanks for the info. What made you choose 45 degrees vs 60? Was your shifter also modified so that the balls were closer together? The Vex shifters are spaced apart by 0.5" so the full cylinder stroke travel is required.
Since it was my first time designing a ball shifter and I wasn't sure the design decisions that led Vex to choose the 60 deg angle, I went with the 45 deg angle as a safer alternative. (As 192 prefers to use the smallest actuators possible.)

The ball cavity spacing is the same (I've never actually looked at that value before today), however the stroke is shorter because I designed our shifter shaft to engage in different positions along the shaft for each gear.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2014-05-13 at 8.59.27 AM.png
Views:	59
Size:	53.0 KB
ID:	17001