Thread: Coaxial Swerve Derivation with Paired Modules
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2014, 15:51
Dave McLaughlin's Avatar
Dave McLaughlin Dave McLaughlin is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Pullman, WA
Posts: 299
Dave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond reputeDave McLaughlin has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coaxial Swerve Derivation with Paired Modules
1983 also did this in 2009. Ty is right, with the amount of similar motors a full swerve would be the way to go if you are confident you can build it and control it.