View Single Post
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2014, 20:31
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,817
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need help in deciding the configuration for an off season chassis prototype

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErvinI View Post
Is there a specific reason why you believe that WCD's are run in a long configuration? Is it just what you've seen, or is there an underlying design advantage for a WCD that is best seen in a long configuration?
It's what I've seen since 2003/2004, when the WCD was first unleashed. In general, most WCDs I've seen have been long. (For that matter, most robots have been long, too.)

There is one potential advantage, and it could be a key reason for the long robot. 6WD WCDs (OK, any 6WD drop-center drive) tend to be a little "tippy" when accelerating front-to-back or vice versa--how tippy depends on the drop height. A wide robot that tips front-to-back will often have its CG move dangerously close to outside the contact patch, which condition--if met--generally results in a tipped robot. But a long robot doing the same tip has a lot more room for the CG to not be outside the contact patch. Proper engineering will mitigate that little problem; improper engineering will at best leave it as is; at worst, the robot just tips when suddenly switching directions.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk