View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2014, 21:49
pwnageNick's Avatar
pwnageNick pwnageNick is offline
It's like yeeee ho
AKA: Nick Coussens
FRC #2451 (PWNAGE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 402
pwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coaxial Swerve Derivation with Paired Modules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
How do you get "much better acceleration" if you don't have more torque?
This. Without more torque, then there is no reason why your wheel spin-up would be decreased, thus helping your acceleration. What's your reasoning behnd saying you do not get more torque?

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61
The main problem with a 6 cim swerve is that you lose all your cims that could go to a manipulator.
I think some teams on Einstein this season would have disagreed with you.

-Nick
__________________
FRC 2451: PWNAGE, Student/Team President (2009-2012)
FRC/VEX 2451: PWNAGE, Strategy/Design Mentor (2013-)
VEXU NAR: North American Robotics, Student/Chapter President (2013-)