View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2014, 22:19
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coaxial Swerve Derivation with Paired Modules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
It's not incorrect if you look closely at what Krv is supposed to be. It's supposed to be rolling resistance force proportional to vehicle speed (not wheel speed).
Yes; I meant incorrect compared to what is actually physically happening.

I imagine even if you corrected it to be wheel speed it would not be quite right, since it's supposed to be accounting for rolling friction losses, and clearly the physics are pretty different when you're slipping the wheels from when you're rolling.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016