Thread: 971's chassis
View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-05-2014, 01:09
AustinSchuh AustinSchuh is offline
Registered User
FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics) #254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 803
AustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond reputeAustinSchuh has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 971's chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post
Thanks for the quick reply: some follow up questions.

- I'm assuming you guys are using 5052. Confirm/deny?
5052-H32 for the parts that are bent, and we use some 6061-T6 when things aren't bent and need to be strong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post
- Are the tolerances on the laser cutter and the turret punch the same?
No. I'd trust a laser to +- 0.001 or better, and a punch to +- 0.005. Sponsors tend to be pessimistic about what their machines can do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post
- How has your experience been in bending over holes? Do the holes deform and you only use them for access sake? Or is it reliable to allow critical parts to interface with those holes?
We don't do it to the extent that we will redesign the part to avoid doing that, or only use them for access. We keep all holes about 3/8" away from any bends, otherwise the holes will blow out and the k-factor will be affected. If there is a hole too close to a bend, we will make it into a slot and break the bend. Some machine shops will leave the holes out and put them back with a mill after bending it, which is a waste of everyone's time.