View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-21-2014, 07:36 PM
ArtemusMaximus's Avatar
ArtemusMaximus ArtemusMaximus is offline
Enginerd
FTC #11722
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 248
ArtemusMaximus is a name known to allArtemusMaximus is a name known to allArtemusMaximus is a name known to allArtemusMaximus is a name known to allArtemusMaximus is a name known to allArtemusMaximus is a name known to all
Re: VIAIR 250C-IG Compressor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall View Post
There are several tradeoffs involved in designing heatsink fins, but the main one is providing enough conduction to supply the fin with heat, and enough convection to remove the heat from the fin. (Radiation is often negligible, unless you're in a non-convective environment, like space.)

Convection is affected by fin spacing and airflow. In general, active cooling with a fan can use more closely spaced fins. Passive cooling using natural convection tends to employ widely spaced fins. The most efficient fins in natural convection are often cylindrical or conical, but those are fairly difficult to make, and so straight fins are substituted instead.

Additionally, conduction is affected by the thermal resistance over the material interfaces. If the heat has to cross a lot of material boundaries to get to where it's convected away, the heatsink will tend to be less efficient.

You'll also find that some areas of a heatsink are less efficient than others, relative to the mass of the material used. The squarish blocks on the corner of your design come immediately to mind: they're going to be relatively cold (because they're far from the heat source and exposed to the air), and thus have a small temperature difference with the surroundings, which means less heat flow.
Thank you Tristan for your input and good overall summary of the physics involved.
I started working on it over 3 weeks ago and it hasn't been easy process.
I challenged myself with few parameters and as anything else in life few of them competing with each other:
  • Cheap. So that even "poor" teams can afford it.
  • Easy to manufacture with basic tools. So that even poor teams can afford it. (drill, wood hole cutting attachment, metal saw or grinder with cut wheel etc.)
  • Hopefully increase Duty Cycle from 9% to at least 50%
  • Easily mounted, so that compressor is untinkered ( to comply with FRC Rules)

Challenge will be making round cuts so they stick tight to the compressor, so that heat can be absorbed more efficiently.

So if any of you have any suggestions to improve the design, I am all ears