View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-05-2014, 15:51
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is online now
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,707
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Attention Mascots (and teams with one)

Can we cool it with the ridiculous derailment about which gender is or isn't more likely to be a victim or a perpetrator of sexual harassment? We don't need screams of "NOT ALL MEN ARE LIKE THAT" every time we ever talk about an issue that involves gender. Yes, it's possible for a woman to sexually harass a man too. Are we done now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wireties View Post
Making FIRST-wide rules about mascots seems premature and a little too PC at this juncture.
How many reported incidents of sexual harassment does it take for rules about mascots to stop being premature and "PC"?

I'm sure that this kind of thing happens far more often than it is reported. To a victim, reporting something like this can seem embarrassing or worse, pointless. There is a perceived stigma against "creating drama" on many teams and in many cases the victim may pay a social penalty of sorts for coming forward, particularly if the perpetrator was well liked and had many friends on the team.

We need to do more than just be reactive to cases of harassment - we need to be proactive. Teams need to make sure their mascots and the rest of their team knows that no means no and to NEVER touch someone else unprompted or otherwise without consent. In the cases where this sort of thing is reported, we need absolutely zero tolerance for this behavior. The student should be removed from the team and the venue (by team managment preferably). We simply can't afford to allow FIRST to be a place where anyone feels violated or otherwise unsafe (not in the "safety glasses" sense).

Just a week ago we were all scratching our heads about how we could make robotics more welcoming to women. Pretty much the least welcoming thing we could do is be complicit with harassment. Even isolated incidents can drive a student away for good, or worse, leave them with emotional trauma. While I'm not suggesting we would be able to prevent all cases of harassment, if we establish a visible and firm culture of respect, consent, and boundaries, people will be less hesitant to speak out when these situations do happen.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote