View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-06-2014, 00:35
Dunngeon Dunngeon is offline
Pumped
AKA: Ryan
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 299
Dunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Maximizing the in-line CoF of Omni-wheels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce Paputa View Post
Significantly better than omnis with standard rollers. Even if you could only get the COF to 1.1 or 1.2, that would be 10 or 20%. Looking at the difference of the two different vex versawheels (http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/wh...sawheels.html), the W tread adds an additional 20% compared to the DT tread. You could probably get a similar increase by adding a pattern to the omni rollers.
All things equal, it would, but given how Omni's behave in a pushing match against another robot that isn't dead center. It would likely negate much of the gain that would be seen. (i.e. they break loose/slide in a direction away from the pusher, effectively rendering the friction gain useless)

Given the amount of time that would be put into building these (taking apart the wheels, rollers, testing,ect.), I think a team interested in Omni's could easily design something else that fits the bill better (Such as Butterfly) and be much happier with the results.
__________________
(2015-?): 973
(2012-2015): 955