Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber
Which begs the question, why can't we ALL run more cost effective events? If we accept the premise that the decrease in pizzaz at districts is an acceptable loss given the increase in availability why do traditional regionals have to cost so much money?
|
I could be wrong, but I believe the AV and a few other things essentially have a mandated cost floor due to what FIRST requires for regionals. Someone please correct this if not.
California is doing their best to run cheap events, with half of our events essentially run as close to a district as they can be under the regional model.
The bummer of all this though is even that it's great for the events to save money, since none of our fees go to the events, teams don't save any money.