View Single Post
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-06-2014, 11:23
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,812
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Limiting Drivetrain Motors

Quote:
Originally Posted by qnetjoe View Post
Just to kill some parallels, in F1 the top speed of the cars is what they seek to limit by the rules and that has stayed rather close in the last 15 years or so. Lap times have been going down due to advancements in suspension and handling. The reason they claim to need to limit top speed is due to safety.
I won't disagree that F1 lap times have been improved primarily by suspension and handling, but it doesn't negate the parallel. If motor availability (engine displacement) is reduced then teams will find other ways to make their robots (cars) just as fast as they were, like multi-speed automatic transmissions (improvements in suspension, brakes, and tires). This fits in nicely with your point - the restriction won't slow down the higher-end teams who can devote resources to making more advanced transmissions (develop suspension, tires, brakes) but it will hurt middle and bottom tier teams who do not have the resources to devote to these efforts.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.