
27-06-2014, 04:56
|
 |
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
 FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
|
|
|
Re: pic: Too much power?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinSchuh
We run our last reduction outside our gearbox, and run a dead axle on the wheel. While we haven't had to do it on competition, we are careful to design it so that our transmissions can be pulled very quickly with minimal effort. Our last reduction is a gear reduction outside the gearbox to enable this. This also reduces the loads inside the gearbox significantly.
After the first bend, the bends are 'free'. By running flat plates, you can pick different materials, and shortcircuit an entire part of the process, making it cheaper for sponsors. Food for thought. We put bends in where we need them, and don't worry too much.
We have been running 090 on our gearboxes for years. Make sure that there aren't unsupported large gearbox faces, and tie your standoffs to the plates close to the CIM bolts to create a better load path. Should be fine after that. Do be aware that VP's flanged bearings have a relief that makes them practically unusable with 090 sheet. They press in up until the flange, and then rattle around...
We ran 4 CIMs last year, and will run 4 CIMs again. There is a good chance that 1678 will join us next year, and 'upgrade' from 6 CIMs. They sat dead at SVR in the finals due to a dead breaker. I'd rather our driver push a slightly slower bot to the limit than have to baby a faster bot to keep it running until the end of the match. Food for thought.
|
I believe 1678 died due to removing the autoshifting code, resulting in a blow. It's not that hard to add a collision detection to a drive.
|