Quote:
Originally Posted by notmattlythgoe
Where I'm lost is the fact that negInertiaAccumulator is never used again in this method, and it's a local variable so its lost after the method is complete. This means on the next run through of this method all of the negative inertia work is lost and the correction is only done for one iteration. What am I missing?
|
Good catch. That's a bug. The original C++ code from 2011 had the accumulator as a member variable.