View Single Post
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-07-2014, 16:26
kk052's Avatar
kk052 kk052 is offline
CAD extraordinaire
AKA: kyle lundquist
FRC #2517 (the green wrenches)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: washington
Posts: 42
kk052 can only hope to improve
Re: pic: New serve mk.1-2517

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gdeaver View Post
This design effort seams to be focused on mechanical losses experienced in the 2014 swerve module. What specific problems did you have? Have you identified where the losses on the current module are? Have you quantified the total losses? I see some potential problem areas in the current Module. Before I say more, what have you found so far? Know what the 1st iteration problems are before you design the 2nd iteration.
it was designed to be smaller, lighter but stilll be made cheaply (-ish), the lower number of transfers is a result of deciding to remove the chain and first axle of a traditional swerve,(because steel chain is heavy)
im no expert on mechanical efficiency (that's Tyler's job) but the system should be more efficient if we took out an axle and a chain (once again i could be wrong, im not too good with theoretical mechanical efficiency, if it stalls we just throw another moter on it and/or lower the ratio)
__________________
FRC TEAM 2517 The Green Wrenches
2012 Autodesk Oregon regional
Chairman's award, Entrepreneurship award, Pit safety award
2013 central Washington regional
Imagery award, Pit safety award
2014 we won something but i forgot

-"the CAD is only accurate if you machine it accurate!!!"
--"its not working because your doing it wrong!!!"
---"is it really ok to put an acronym in an acronym?" (FIRST)RC?

Last edited by kk052 : 03-07-2014 at 16:53.
Reply With Quote