View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-07-2014, 22:31
magnets's Avatar
magnets magnets is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 748
magnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 45 years ago....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Woelki View Post
Here is an interesting perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlGemHL5vLY
An awesome video.

I do agree that NASA doesn't need to suddenly start sending manned missions to Mars, but they could be working, like SpaceX, to find better ways to put satellites into orbit. SpaceX is a private company. They'd only do this if there was money to be made eventually.

That being said, sending people into space is way cooler. We pay Russia a bunch of money every time we send a guy up to the ISS. It's be pretty neat if it worked the other way. I'm not saying they'd make money, but we'd hear a lot more about space.

Currently, most Americans contribute less than $9 per year to NASA with their federal income tax. That's less than a pack of cigarettes (in NY).
Reply With Quote