Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis
Code:
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
New 1 1 14 38 30 26 27 23 29 14
Dropped 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 2 9
Total 1 2 16 54 81 104 130 152 179 184
|
Dunno if your "New" numbers are correct but the "Dropped" numbers jive are exact with my counts.
The thing that concerns me is the lack of success that MN has had on the larger stage. While that isn't exactly the best metric for team quality it's, I believe, an important metric to look at and analyze. Have regions that've grown slower had more competitive success? Have there been regions that've grown the same way but have had more competitive success? How has "team churn" related to competitive success?