View Single Post
  #161   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-08-2014, 19:37
donkehote's Avatar
donkehote donkehote is offline
Design/Manufacture/Strategy Mentor
AKA: Kevin
FRC #5031
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 89
donkehote is just really nicedonkehote is just really nicedonkehote is just really nicedonkehote is just really nice
Re: blog; Motor Controller Options for 2015

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post
Labeling is a listed exemption in the relevant 2014 robot rules regarding modifying electronics; adding thermal paste isn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post
My common sense doesn't matter. I'm just cautioning against applying thermal paste/grease to motor controllers since the (2014) rule against modifying control system components specifically mentions gluing as an illegal modification.

Again, as Ether pointed out, thermal paste IS NOT GLUE. Glue is an adhesive, thermal paste is not.

Webster defines glue as : a substance used to stick things tightly together
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glue
Even if you change glue to adhesive, thermal paste is not there to retain anything. It usually has a very weak bond, and often never sets, remaining a very thick liquid/gel.

Velcro is attached by adhesive or glue, but is legal. Please stop beating the dead horse and move on. I know at least a few teams will have the thermal paste on these speed controllers, if its explicitly allowed or not. It would be almost impossible for a robot inspector to see the thermal paste in place anyway. Im sure as soon as the Q&A opens, there will be more than one person who asks this. No need to keep dragging up the same ridiculous argument.
__________________

2014- 5031 Mentor
2013- 1310 Mentor
2012- 4258 Mentor
2011-2012 865 Mentor
2006-2008 1814 Team Captain, Main Driver, Mechanical
Reply With Quote