View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-10-2014, 13:20
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,050
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: Weeks 1-2 Elo Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
My baseline was just using OPR for predicting match outcomes, it was able to predict about 77.1% of the matches this year. This was calculated by adding up the OPRs of each alliance and comparing with the result of the match. TrueSkill was able to predict 79.0% of the matches, a pretty good improvement. I need to develop the prediction model a bit better because it currently doesn't take into account the standard deviation as a measure of certainty. The modified Elo system was able to predict 79.5% of matches, an improvement over TrueSkill. The baseline, unadulterated Elo system as used in this thread was able to predict a whopping 81.4% of matches, by far the best out of any of these models.
Try calculating "OPR" using min L1 norm of residuals (LAD) instead of min L2 norm (least squares), and see how that compares.


Reply With Quote