View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-10-2014, 16:00
Cash4587's Avatar
Cash4587 Cash4587 is offline
Mentor
AKA: Cooper Cash
FRC #4587 (Jersey Voltage)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 303
Cash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud ofCash4587 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: Team 449 Hex Drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuclearnerd View Post
I wonder if anyone has thought about anti-anti-tpinning frames It seems to me that if your opponents front bumper were split in two (as shown on the top side of the diagram below), they might easily "straddle" the side points of your hexagon making it just as hard (maybe harder?) to get out of a T-pin as a straight side would be.


This isn't a critique of your design directly - lots of teams have been experimenting with hexagonal bases recently
My team this year had a cutout in the front bumper like you drew. It seemed to be somewhat effective to reduce the effects of teams hex drives. (our bumper cutout gap was 11" to make room for our arm when in the down position) However we really only had the chance to use it against 148 whose hex sides weren't as large as some other teams. In order to prove that the cutout really was effective in this aspect we would have liked to try it out on some different angled hex chassis. I don't know if any other teams can attest to this being an effective way to reduce the usefulness of a hex chassis, but please chime in if you have any other ideas on this.
Reply With Quote