View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-11-2014, 22:10
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 422
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Something New - SWE Grant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie_UPS View Post
What if your recruitment is inherently off-putting for people of a certain type (race, gender, religion, etc)? Why would it be bad for a team to look at themselves and explore why they are not diverse? Lets say a high school is 60% female (not unlikely) and a robotics team is 80% male (also not unlikely). Why is it absurd that the diversity of a team reflect the diversity of the school/community that the team pulls from?
I don't disagree. I think that everyone should take an objective look at their practices and employ them fairly, not tailor them to gain a specific demographic. I think the most we should do is not put anyone of then make sure the message is spread as widely as possible. Theoretically even if a team was perfectly fair with team roles and recruitment exsternal factors (parents, peer pressure, media, etc.) can offten (not always) prevent it from evenly representing the community it is in.
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620
Reply With Quote