View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-11-2014, 02:24
nathannfm's Avatar
nathannfm nathannfm is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FRC #3940
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 331
nathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant future
Re: Examples of when it is not advantageous to be lightweight

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence View Post
One of the first things many mentors I have learned from tend to tell me is how to lighten a robot and that "lighter is better" (not always true, but it's a point that has been stressed enough to me in my education that I started this thread because of it
I think this is always true of subsystems, including the drive, until you start to sacrifice structural integrity, but not true for the robot as a whole. When I say "lighter is better" it is usually because if it's not stressed you get to week 5 with a 150lb robot and a major sub system has to be removed because there is no time to redesign all of them to be lighter. On MOE we always have 120.00lb robots because we usually shoot for maximum functionality (do all the things!) and this usually requires more weight than a robot specialized to do a specific task. We embrace this so much that if we get to week 4 or 5 and realize we have 4lb to spare we try to think of a way to use that 4lb to make our job easier, more reliable, or faster.
__________________

[2016-20??]: Mentor: FRC Team 3940"CyberTooth"
[2013-2016]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2012-2013]: Mentor: FRC Team 3929 "Atomic Dragons"
[2011-2012]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2008-2011]: Student: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2007-2008]: Student: FTC Team 365 "MOE"
[2005-2007]: Student: FLL Team "The MOEstangs"