View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-11-2014, 22:09
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,505
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: How to do calculations with a 2 CIM, 1 Mini-CIM gearbox?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Wallace View Post
There is a rich tradition in engineering of celebrating prolific contributors by naming standard physical units after them. For example, the unit of electrical capacitance is named for Michael Faraday, and the unit of power transfer/conversion is named for James Watt.

I propose naming the fundamental unit of FRC drivetrain "oomf" in honor of JVN.

Let's say the "oomf" of a well designed four CIM drivetrain is one JVN. Then by the approximation John proposed above, a well designed drivetrain with four CIMs and two mini-CIMs will deliver 1.3 JVN of "oomf", while a well designed six CIM drivetrain is good for 1.5 JVN.

Your oomf may vary.
The resistance of the battery makes the 1.5 JVN number a bit idealized though