Quote:
Originally Posted by Arpan
Have you considered trying to make the Cims or shafts removable to facilitate easy gearbox removal?
Also, you may want more than just the two holes in the WCD block to mount the gearbox to the tube. Two more holes higher up on the gearbox would add a lot of strength.
|
The Cims are already removable. (although not very easily) I've considered making the gearbox removable, but I haven't come up with anything slick yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jagoldman
1) How much does it weigh?
2) What are the actual gears that are being used? The tooth count would be good, no need for product numbers.
3) How do you plan on mounting the gearbox?
|
It weighs 1.9 lbs without motors and 10.5 with them according to inventor.
First stage is 12 to 54, second stage low is 24 to 60, and second stage high is 40 to 44.
It's mounted with the standard bearing block and the two bolts the are out to the sides.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arpan
I seem to recall that ballshifters wear out faster ,but I could be wrong there.
|
The VEXpro ballshifter has a small aluminum shifting rod that tends to wear out. In this design, we would make out own out of steel for longevity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
I think the lightening on the plates is just a bit too aggressive. Reducing weight is nice and all but you still want to keep your gearbox rigid and strong.
|
That's just how I roll. If we're already going to be milling out the plates, why not optimize for the lowest weight reasonable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
I have my doubts about the press fit into the end of the ballshifter shaft in such a configuration.
|
This uses a simple one piece output shaft. Machinable on a manual mill and lathe.
Thanks for all the great responses! Keep it up!