|
Re: pic: 3 CIM WCD Ball Shifter CAD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared
I modified my gearbox plate to look more like yours and did a simple factor of safety analysis. A lower factor of safety corresponds to more load on the material, and a greater deformation of the part.
You could likely get away with what you have drawn up, but some simple improvements will yield huge strength increases. The biggest change you should make is using the 0.75" boss on the front of the CIM to help locate the CIM. It'll increase the positional accuracy of the CIM by quite a bit, and it'll make the part even stronger.
All tests were done with the the mounting holes as fixed geometry, and the only load was gravity acting on the 2.82 pound CIM motor. You can roughly double the strength of the part while adding about 0.03 pounds.
You can also see why having a convex outline helps too.
http://imgur.com/a/xTIpW
This is what we came up with last year for a 3 CIM configuration:
http://imgur.com/DSjie1M
|
Thanks you! This is useful information. 
I will consider these images when modifying the design.
What software did you use for this?
EDIT:
Quote:
|
stress analysis on a couple of our gearbox plates in SolidWorks
|
Sorry, I missed that.
__________________
FLL Team Future imagineers
2010 Oregon State Championships: Winners
2011 International Invite: First place Robot design, Second Place Robot Performance
FRC Team Mean Machine
2012 Seattle: Winning alliance
2013 Portland: Winning alliance
2013 Spokane: Winning alliance
2014 Wilsonville: Winning alliance
2014 Worlds: Deans List Winner
Last edited by Bryce2471 : 01-12-2014 at 18:09.
|