View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-12-2014, 01:04
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,807
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Fitting belts within your frame

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
+1. 6063 has a much lower tensile strength and stiffness than 6061. If you take a hard hit to the side, 6063 bends much easier. It's cheaper, but it's not worth it; just move to 2x1.
This is somewhat misleading.

6063-T6 has a 15% lower yield (35 ksi vs 40 ksi). Two identical cross sections in 6061 and 6063 have the same stiffness because stiffness is a product of Young's Modulus (which is basically 10,000 ksi for all aluminum alloys). Welded joints will be 40% weaker than in 6061, but any annealed aluminum is already incredibly weak regardless of alloy.

Our experience using square/rectangular tubing is that there is no difference. Quality 6063 should machine more easily than 6061, but I know that 973 has gotten some before that was far gummier than even 6061 (which is an impressive feat).
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254