|
Re: pic: 3 CIM WCD Ball Shifter Second Edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.C.
We like the ability to do that so we can add CIMs in later/makes wiring a little easier without CIMs in the way. Also much much lighter without the CIMs in so its easier to handle etc..
The reason why I'm not a huge fan of using all bolts connected to CIMs is during assembly you either:
a) Have to assemble with CIMs to hold the gearbox together or
b) Put it together and put nuts in the back, then when putting in CIMs having to take each nut off.
Nothing crazy revolutionary but could make your life easier.
|
That makes sense. I agree that it would be a slight inconvenience. Although I like the idea of using the CIMs as standoff nuts because most of the forces on the back plate come from the CIM mounts, and because it lightens things.
__________________
FLL Team Future imagineers
2010 Oregon State Championships: Winners
2011 International Invite: First place Robot design, Second Place Robot Performance
FRC Team Mean Machine
2012 Seattle: Winning alliance
2013 Portland: Winning alliance
2013 Spokane: Winning alliance
2014 Wilsonville: Winning alliance
2014 Worlds: Deans List Winner
|