Thread: RI3D this year?
View Single Post
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-12-2014, 12:50
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,654
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: RI3D this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woolly View Post
You know, if there were more RI3D teams, there would be a wider range of bots to copy. In fact, an increase in the number of RI3D bots would allow for low-resource, low-experience, low-budget, and/or low-originality teams being presented with a lot of ideas and having the opportunity to choose between the bots presented to them. They could even design a hybrid of several of the robots and several of the ideas presented to fit a strategy.
Intuitively, sure. However, last year's evidence doesn't really suggest the results scale like that.

In 2014, every design pursued some sort of catapult launcher. All but one used an overhead roller for accumulation. Only O-Ryon differed significantly in terms of the strategy pursued for their robot.
Reply With Quote