Since these threads discussing "most competitive" or "strongest" or "toughest" events are inquiring about robot performance and BBQ or Sauce has been pointed to as the appropriate performance metric I have been curious as to why a judged award (Chairman's) should be included in the conversation. I think it would be more insightful to examine the data for event champions/winners normalized like a batting average for the number of events entered in a team's history.
__________________
2016 Carson W 2122, 2052, 3538, 41, AZ North W 2122, 125, 498, MQA, Idaho F 2122, 3250, 3513, MQA, CCC W 2122, 9122, 6174, ICA
2015 Tesla SF IDA 2122, 3360, 2960, 1311 IRI SF 2338, 2122, 107, 234 UT F 2122, 3230, 3405, EEA, WFFA, AZ West W 2122, 3309, 5059, ICA
2014 Galileo QF 1717, 2122, 3683, 193 UT W 2122, 2996, 3191, ICA, CCC W 1678, 2122, 9073, ICA
2013 CalGames W 2122, 1678, 4171, Judges Award
2012 Newton QF 2122, 610, 488 Spokane W 2122, 1983, 4082, EEA
2011 Newton SF 1730, 2122, 11 IRI F 3138, 16, 2122, 1730, UT W 2122, 399, 3239, MQA, Seattle F 2122, 488, 2850, MQA
2010 Galileo SF 78, 51, 2122 UT W 1696, 2122, 3405, IDA, Sacramento F 2122, 2035, 1834, IDA,
2009 Sacramento F 2144, 692, 115, 2122, MQA
2008 Newton Sacramento W 2122, 1662, 115, CA
2007 PNW Regional Highest Rookie Seed
"Enjoying traveling to more distant events" since 2007