View Single Post
  #152   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-12-2014, 13:59
s_forbes's Avatar
s_forbes s_forbes is offline
anonymous internet person
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,150
s_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: VEXpro 2015 Product line launch

(meandering a bit off topic)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Modeling a round tube conservatively at .5x.201 I get 97.4% the bending stength.
For those curious why the hole makes little difference to the bending strength, check out the list of second moment area of inertias for different shapes. For two axles of the same diameter, the second moment area of inertia is proportional to the amount of bending load it can withstand. The r^4 term is what makes the small hole have little effect on the bending strength of the axle.

My napkin calculations put the ThunderHex axle (with the hole) at about 46% stronger (in bending) than a solid 7/16" hex shaft of the same material.
Reply With Quote