View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-12-2014, 16:33
AGPapa's Avatar
AGPapa AGPapa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Antonio Papa
FRC #5895
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 323
AGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strongest regional competitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anupam Goli View Post
You've just described what I hate the most about the great sport of college football: pre-season rankings. In the world of college football, media outlets try to assign rankings before the season starts to generate hype, the media $$$, and show their perceptions of which teams are strong. Most of the times, the end of year rankings are completely different from the preseason rankings.
AP Poll Preseason top 5 teams:
Florida State
Alabama
Oregon
Oklahoma
Ohio State

AP Poll Week 16 top 5 teams:
Alabama
Florida State
Oregon
Baylor
Ohio State

So the AP Poll went from Oklahoma being #4 to unranked, but other than that, the preseason polls seemed to do a pretty decent job. Four of the preseason top five were still in the top five at the end.

So sure, you can't account for every factor (like student, mentor and sponsor loss), but preseason predictions can still do a fairly decent job. Good teams tend to be good from year to year. What are the chances that every team at a regional will be worse than the year before? Pretty slim. Some teams will get worse, but others will get better.


The Waterloo regional will be one of the more competitive ones next year. Only two of the teams attending were not in eliminations at any event last year.

EDIT: I decided to expand on the method of ranking events by % of teams in elims at their first event the previous year. It is slated more to areas with smaller event sizes the previous year (like PNW). This probably makes it a poor indicator of regional competitiveness. However, it still gives insights, especially within areas of similar event sizes. For example, Hatboro is ranked much higher than other MAR districts.
Here are the results:

Code:
PNWMt.Vernon				80.65%
PNWAuburnMountainview		        78.13%
PNWWilsonville				71.88%
PNWAuburn				68.75%
PNWWestValley				68.00%
Waterloo				67.86%
MARHatboro-Horsham			66.67%
NEPineTree				66.67%
PNWPhilomathPeak			66.67%
MARMt.Olive				65.79%
Hawaii				        65.71%
PNWOregonCity				65.63%
PNWCentralWashingtonUniversity          65.63%
MIHowell				64.86%
NewYorkTechValley			64.71%
NEPioneerValley				64.52%
PNWGlacierPeak				63.64%
MIWestMichigan				62.50%
PNWShorewood				62.50%
MIWaterford				61.54%
NENortheastern				60.00%
CentralValley				59.46%
NorthBay				59.46%
InlandEmpire				58.33%
NEWaterbury				57.58%
ArizonaEast				57.50%
ArkansasRockCity			56.90%
TorontoEast				56.52%
MIWoodhaven				56.25%
NEUMass-Dartmouth			56.00%
CentralIllinois				55.26%
MARBridgewater-Raritan		        55.26%
Ventura				        55.17%
NEUNH				        55.00%
TorontoCentral				54.76%
MARNorthBrunswick		        54.55%
Utah				        53.85%
INPerryMeridian				52.78%
NERhodeIsland				52.78%
MICenterline				52.50%
Pittsburgh				52.00%
MexicoCity				51.22%
QueenCity				51.02%
NEGraniteState				50.00%
MARSpringsideChestnutHill		50.00%
MILivonia				50.00%
NEHartford				50.00%
WindsorEssexGreatLakes		        50.00%
ArizonaWest				50.00%
MIBedford				50.00%
SouthFlorida				49.06%
SiliconValley				49.06%
WesternCanada				48.39%
MITraverseCity				47.50%
MITroy				        47.22%
INPurdue				46.15%
MIKentwood				45.45%
LosAngeles				45.45%
HubCity				        45.45%
MARUpperDarby				44.12%
Wisconsin				43.86%
MIEscanaba				43.33%
MARSeneca				43.24%
Buckeye				        43.10%
GeorgiaSouthernClassic		        42.86%
Israel				        42.86%
St.Louis				42.86%
Colorado				41.67%
Chesapeake				41.38%
LasVegas				41.30%
Minnesota10000Lakes			41.27%
SBPLILongIsland			        41.18%
FingerLakes				40.54%
Montreal				40.43%
MISouthfield				40.00%
NEReading				40.00%
INKokomo				40.00%
MISt.Joseph				40.00%
GreaterDC				40.00%
MIGreatLakesBayRegion	                37.50%
Oklahoma				37.29%
MinnesotaNorthStar		        36.67%
LakeSuperior				36.51%
Palmetto				36.36%
LoneStar				36.00%
Dallas				        35.42%
MIKetteringUniversity			35.00%
SanDiego				35.00%
KansasCity				34.62%
Midwest				        34.00%
NorthernLights				33.33%
Bayou				        32.73%
Alamo				        32.26%
MILansing				32.26%
Virginia				31.75%
MIStandish				31.25%
Orlando				        31.25%
SmokyMountains				30.77%
Peachtree				30.30%
MIGullLake				30.00%
Sacramento				29.55%
NorthCarolina				29.09%
NewYorkCity				25.76%
Australia				15.38%

Last edited by AGPapa : 18-12-2014 at 08:43.
Reply With Quote