View Single Post
  #444   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-12-2014, 16:53
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 957
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2015 HINT DISCUSSION

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post
I don't consider de-scoring to be in the spirit of Gracious Professionalism, but that's just me.
I would disagree with it being against the spirit of Gracious Professionalism if its part of the rule book I wouldn't argue with it.
Either way the biggest issue with de-scoring is while it can be a fantastic game mechanic without proper balancing most games end up in tug of war and most games I see de-scoring be a really cool mechanic are games with more then two teams.

Looking over at the emphasis on change I am completely befuddled on any catchy names for games with the word "Change">

Does anyone have copies of past rule books and have they thumbed through it?
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
I liked my team more before they stole my jacket.
Play is for kids this is serious...
Reply With Quote