View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-12-2014, 21:31
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 958
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2015 HINT DISCUSSION

Anyone else considering a forced role game. That being a siege style game or attack defense. Think most video games call it assault or whatever where you take turns defending an objective or pushing it. The popular one that comes to mind is CS:GO or counter strike where you have one team trying to stop a bomb from being planted and the other team trying to plant it. The concept we steal from here is that you have red alliance and blue alliance and one alliance is forced to play defensively and one side is forced to play offense. Going in line with "Kit bots can contribute" just having a body blocker on offense or defense is viable, and current field constraints work. I'd like to believe that some game in the future or even this coming game is done in an assault style.
Also wouldn't FIRST be shooting a few companies in the foot by going Lunacy and forcing certain design choices like wheels?
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
So I got my jacket back, but it turns out the "W" in WPI doesn't stand for that steak sauce I can't pronounce.
Play is for kids this is serious...
Reply With Quote