View Single Post
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 08:55
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is offline
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,568
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 971's Control System

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinSchuh View Post
I don't think I've done a root-locus plot since I got out of school. We tend to use the pole placement tools (and LQR and a bit of practice/intuition) to do the final tuning. I never ask the kids to do anything I wouldn't be willing to do myself.
I remember loathing any assignment requiring root-locus plots. I never really got much out of them anyway (maybe it was just how it was presented). I'm pretty sure I learned more about the control system while making the root-locus plot than anything the plot actually told me when it was done. I've wondered why more teams haven't done LQR or lead-lag compensators. I seem to remember a good LQR was somewhat easy to implement if you knew the dynamics of your system pretty well, but I believe PID is probably more forgiving if you don't fully understand it. Is there any truth to that?
Reply With Quote