View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:23
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,221
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence View Post
Well I'm sorry, but it is a universal truth at the current time. They keyword isn't never, it's necessary. Swerve is never necessary. There is no situation in modern day FRC where the only possible solution is swerve. Until FIRST makes a game where swerve is required, the phrase, "Swerve is never necessary" will be a universal truth. If that statement were false, the only winners of Einstein would be swerve drives, and I know you're a smart kid who follows FRC and its history, so you know that's not the case. Can swerve be advantageous for some? Certainly. Is it ever necessary though? Never.
I know it's a universal truth. But it always will be, unless the rules starts demanding swerve drives. The rules also don't specify that you have to drive, so therefore it's unnecessary to drive. But it's useless to say that because driving is useful. Same with swerves. It's not necessary, but that means nothing (or almost nothing) in terms of whether it should be done or not.
Reply With Quote