View Single Post
  #136   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 02:58
cglrcng cglrcng is offline
Registered User
FRC #0060
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 420
cglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond reputecglrcng has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
TNA is very interesting to me. I'm still pretty on the fence if I would prefer it changed or not.

However, I find it hilarious that the game piece is named LITTER in a recycling themed game. If these rules are kept the same, here are some things you might hear at competition this year:
"We only want to litter if you litter as well"
"WHY AREN'T THEY LITTERING!"
"Wait, I forget, were we supposed to litter just now?"
"I can't believe they didn't litter."
"You said that you were going to litter and you didn't, we're going to cross you off our pick list now."
"There's only 30 seconds left, quick, litter as much as you can!"
________________________

Yes..."Recycling would be fully OUT THE WINDOW!" Not good in a game named "Recycle RUSH!" (I should be sleeping instead of laughing about the predicament of possible FRC wide TNA. But, I can't quit laughing enough to lay my head down yet). That, and I'm currently formatting a proposed "TNA littering contract" form between page reads. "Forget Recycling...Wanna sign a contract to litter?" Or,...We only agree to recycle 5 times, and litter 5 times...No, we want the rights to recycle 3 times and litter 7 times.......Oh boy!