View Single Post
  #175   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 19:25
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,605
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koko Ed View Post
It's very interesting that this has been a debate before. I didn't know the tournament rules for 2003 (I was in 3rd grade!) so I looked them up:

Quote:
Both teams in the losing alliance get their own alliance score in Qualifying Points (QP’s). Both teams
in the winning alliance get their own score plus twice the losing alliance’s score in QP's.
Similar to 2010 it looks like it rewarded high scoring losses more than a low scoring win - discouraging defense. But 2003 was a game with winning and losing.



I think there's a key difference to this year's game. There is no winning and losing until the very last match. It's not fixing a match if there's no match to be played. The goal for each alliance is to pure and simple get the most points in the match.