Thread: Compatition Ranking
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 09:10
cbudrecki's Avatar
cbudrecki cbudrecki is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Budrecki (buh-dre'-key)
FRC #0222 (Tigertrons)
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Tunkhannock, PA
Posts: 275
cbudrecki is a name known to allcbudrecki is a name known to allcbudrecki is a name known to allcbudrecki is a name known to allcbudrecki is a name known to allcbudrecki is a name known to all
Re: Compatition Ranking
My big question is if we are taking an AVERAGE score, then why leave out a surrogate match. Why not have that team's average be based on 11 matches instead of 10 (or whatever the case may be)? I can see in a Win/Loss scenario, or even if we were going with total points, but going off an average?

My fear is that teams will adopt the strategy of sabotaging their surrogate matches. If it doesn't count against them, why not lower the other teams' average? Granted, definitely NOT in the spirit of FIRST, but you know teams will do it. If we did away with surrogates this year, and let a few teams have an extra match figured into their average, I don't see where it would hurt.