|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Yes. My big thing against this is that:
1. If you are willing to partake in the agreement, you should know that it is a RISK and you should be mature enough to face the consequences of your actions - in placing a 50 point differential opportunity on the trust of an opposing alliance.
2. That you would also be mature enough to know that slanderous activity is not the solution. That is 100% not GP, hands down. Cannot defend that. Leave scouting this to INDIVIDUAL teams - if they really are even worried about trusting their enemies. I wouldn't be.
Definitions:
Opposing:
differing from or in conflict with each other.
By the sound of it, would mean you should not be spending efforts trying to agree with them.
Never settle. Reach for the upper hand. You can get more points not doing TNA than you can by doing it. --- Look into this if you don't believe me.
As Syndrome says in The Incredibles, "When everyone's super,... no one will be."
If everyone gets 40 additional points per match, doesn't really help, does it. I know that will not happen, but I'd argue that TNA is the poor man's way of balancing power from the more powerful teams (who, by the way, will hands down decline TNA every time and get the points themselves) by playing... Offensively. Who would have though it would be that way... guess this game really is competitive.
|