View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2015, 08:35
RunawayEngineer RunawayEngineer is offline
Master Commander of All Things Tech
AKA: Ches
FRC #0801 (Horsepower)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Merritt Island
Posts: 66
RunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to behold
Re: [Team Update] 2015-01-06 The Noodle Agreement

I am so glad that they are making changes.
I hope that the collusion problem isn't the only thing that they are going to fix - since it isn't the biggest problem with the current Litter rules.
The ability to directly give points to your opponent has serious implications in the Playoff matches without any collusion required. There are several scenarios where an alliance would have an incentive to give points to their opponent:

An Alliance is confident that they will advance without using Litter points, so they give their opponent 40 points to help them advance to the next level over alliances that are actually stronger.

An Alliance knows that they can't advance, so they start donating points to their favorite teams.

That's without talking to another Alliance at all - the consequences get even worse if they start making agreements.

Alliance A and Alliance B could mutually increase their chances of progression by giving 40 points to each other.

Alliance #1 could promise Alliance #8 that they will give them 40 points (increasing their average for the Quarterfinals by 20) if in return, Alliance #8 returns the favor by contributing 40 points to Alliance #1 in the Semifinals.

I seriously hope that they take away giving points directly to the opponent - it only made sense in the Win/Loss system, but it can be abused in the Average Score system.

Last edited by RunawayEngineer : 07-01-2015 at 08:37. Reason: Chanced a word for clarity
Reply With Quote