Thread: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2015, 12:50
wesbass23 wesbass23 is offline
Registered User
FRC #1732 (Hilltopper Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 140
wesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud ofwesbass23 has much to be proud of
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird View Post
I can see that but having a robot built for bins and noodles is low scoring due to the fact that you need to put it on one tote. A noodle and a bin on nothing is worth nothing and I dunno if it counts as unproccessed litter now that I think about it...
I guarantee you there will be at least one robot that has a failed tote manipulator and must rely on capping stacks. yes this puts pressure on the other two robots on the alliance to be able move totes but chances are pretty good that at least 1 of the 3 robots on an alliance can create stacks. That is part of the challenge of FRC, how do you design your robot to succeed without relying too much on your partners? To succeed in qualifications you usually need to be able to do everything in case your partners don't show up for a match. But once you reach eliminations you tend to get picked on your skill in one particular area.
__________________
2014 Wisconsin Regional Winners with 2481 and 2202
2014 Midwest Regional Finalists with 2338 and 3936
2014 Midwest RCA Winner
2013 Wisconsin Regional Winner with 111 and 2338
2013 MARC Winners with 1718 and 1023
2012 Boilermaker RCA Winner