View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2015, 00:37
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,829
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: McCannot Wheel

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAR_WIG1350 View Post
What if a set mecanum wheels was built that used 2 axles per roller? Since the roller can't rotate about 2 axes simultaneously, there would be no rotation, but there would still be axial free play. Then you could build a set of wheels that is mostly identical, but which uses only one axle per roller to allow rotation. By comparing the 2 wheel sets in situations where the robot strictly moves forward or backward should tell us if there is significant rotation of the rollers in these cases.
I think you're on to something there... depending on the style of wheel it should be possible to non-destructively lock the rotation of the mecanum rollers.

Compare the performance of the robot with locked rollers to that with free-wheeling rollers. If there is a difference in performance, I'd suspect it would be due to the rollers... rolling.

Jason
Reply With Quote