|
Re: Team Update: Drive Team Placement in Playoffs
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV
Blue only can use the advantage if they have robots that are able to capitalize on it. They still have to be faster than the other team. All the placement advantages in the world, won't make the RCs come off the step any faster for you. By giving blue this advantage assuming both alliances has some sort of staggered RC grappling (some of them come off the step faster than others) we are likely allowing Blue to get some but not all the containers, if Red does have at least a faster initial pull of one or more RCs.
Basically what I'm saying is yes the GDC is giving blue an advantage but if Red is faster they still get some of the RCs and you probably have a more even distribution of RCs because of this. (2-2, or 3-1 instead of 4-0). Since Blue can put their faster puller against Red's slower puller (or later RCs if it's one robot doing all 4).
Man we really need to lock down a vocabulary for some of these things.
|
Very true. This ruling also makes it nearly mandatory for a first seed robot to identify and pick the robot that can most quickly (and reliably, of course) grab containers (unless the first seed robot also happens to be the fastest container grabber). If they don't, they could face a blue alliance that prevents them from getting any containers off of the step. At the very least, it's going to be interesting seeing how this all plays out in the first couple of weeks.
__________________
2014 Las Vegas (Winners with 987, 2478; Excellence in Engineering)
2014 San Diego (Finalists with 987, 3250; Quality Award)
2013 Inland Empire (Winners with 1538, 968; Excellence in Engineering Award)
2013 San Diego (Finalists with 2984, 4322; Creativity Award)
2012 Las Vegas (Finalists with 2034, 3187; Quality Award)
|