|
Re: Robot Numbering, Attractive Solutions?
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall
It's FRC man! It's a bit of both.  |
Touche`
I agree we should make our robots as nice & fancy as possible, with whatever branding we can pull off.
My comment was more aimed at the number limitations this year, and so instead of over thinking it, my opinion is to just follow the rules as written and put your design effort in other aspects of the robot. I would just hate to fail inspection because we "got fancy" with our numbers.
But you know we will see some robot numbers that have some style, are readable and pass inspection.
And we'll probably see some numbers that should not have passed inspection out on the field. Like we have with bumper numbers that have stretched the rules.
~shrug~
__________________
Bonny Eagle Robotics Team - BERT 133
2009-2010: Mentor, 2010-2013 Advisor/Mentor, 2013-Present: Mentor/Cad & Graphics Support
2010 - GSR: Excellence in Website Design
2011 - GSR: Motorola Quality Award
2012 - Mainely Spirit: Spirit Award, Human Player Award- GSR: Gracious Professionalism Award, Quarterfinalist- Beantown Blitz: Finalist
2013 - Mainely Spirit: Sportsmanship Award- GSR: Semifinalist, Woodie Flowers Award- PTR: Semifinalist- Beantown Blitz: Semifinalist
2014 - GSD: Spirit Award, 5th seed, Semi Finalists- PTD: 2nd seed, Finalists
2015 - Safety Animation 1st Place Award, PTD: Excellence in Engineering Award, 8th seed, Finalists, UNHD: Spirit Award, 9th seed, 6th seed Finalist Alliance Captain; Event Winner
2016 - NSD: Industrial Design Award, 3rd seed, Semifinalist- PTD: Excellence in Engineering Award, 2nd seed, Event Winner
Opinions expressed here are mine alone, and not necessarily of the team.
|