View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2015, 13:41
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,605
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Binding of a linear slide

Can't see enough to understand clearly, but the problem has two general solutions.

First, is to provide some sort of bearing or glide or close fit (preferably without sharp corners on the leading edges) that act to prevent the rotation. The idea is to so constrain the moving part that it cannot get bound. This will require more precise machining, but usually fewer actively moving parts.

The second is to come up with some "self balancing" way to distribute the load across the piece so that it doesn't get pulled away far enough to get bound. This year on our lift, we used two chains about a foot and a half apart but driven by the same axle. We've only done a few lifts and lowers so far, but we haven't had any binding. We do need to do some more tests with off-center loads to determine how much is too much.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
Reply With Quote