|
Re: Division by average
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95
There is a big difference in principle. In one case up to 5 other teams (per match) are being directly affected by one team's actions without any choice in the matter. In the other case one team is ostensibly gambling their slot in CMP to try and game the system. So, yes, there is a big difference.
I am going to let my original point stand. I acknowledge the impracticality of materially affecting match averages to game the proposed division system, but posit that the impracticality won't stop some teams from trying. It's a bad motivation that is not needed because numerous other methods to sort divisions are available.
You are free to discuss FIRST's openness in a different thread. That is not the purpose of this thread and I would be remiss if I continued that discussion here.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuggetsyl
No team could possibly game the system with 8 divisions. Its statistically impossible.
|
Must I really repeat myself with a post that you quoted? What point are you trying to make that I haven't already acknowledged?
Edit: I don't mean this to come off too harsh. I would like the discussion to move forward instead of harping on the same point that all participants have acknowledged.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Last edited by JamesCH95 : 02-19-2015 at 03:54 PM.
|